The shoulder surgery literature is dominated by low-level evidence and highly variable, often inappropriate, use of outcome scores.
Authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shoulder surgery evidence relies on low-level studies with inconsistent outcomes; challenges clinical interpretation and extends calls for standardized, higher-quality trials.
Harvie et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: