Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Crystal packing structures of 9,10-dimethoxyanthracene ( 1 ), 9,10-bis(methylthio)anthracene ( 2 ), and 9,10-bis(methyltelluro)anthracene ( 3 ) were revealed by X-ray crystallographic analysis as models for the molecular ordering of acenes. Compound 1 is arranged in a herringbone packing motif similar to anthracene. In contrast, compound 2 is arranged by face-to-face π−π stacking with S−S interactions. The anthracene columns of 2 formed by face-to-face π−π stacking are parallel to each other and are linked by the S−S interactions to self-assemble into a 2-D network sheet. The resulting 2-D network sheets are packed parallel to each other in an offset manner. Compound 3 is arranged by face-to-face π−π stacking with Te−Te interactions, concomitant with Te−π interactions, to produce a 2-D network sheet similar to 2 . Thus, the chalcogen−chalcogen interaction plays an important role in the face-to-face π−π stacking arrangement of 9,10-bis(methylchalcogeno)anthracenes 2 and 3 . In contrast to 2, the neighboring 2-D network sheets of 3 are packed to each other with large tilt angle (γ-motif). The self-assembling cyclophane-network structure of {[2( 3 )·2(Ag + )]·(NO 3 - )}·(NO 3 - ) is also described.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: