Why the study?
Social determinants of health contribute to inequities in cardiovascular outcomes, prompting this review of strategies to deliver equity-centered cardiovascular care across clinical, community, and policy settings.
Does integrating multidisciplinary decision-making and addressing social determinants of health improve equity and outcomes in cardiovascular care?
Does integrating multidisciplinary decision-making and addressing social determinants of health improve equity and outcomes in cardiovascular care?
Integrating social determinants of health into cardiovascular care through multidisciplinary Heart Teams and digital infrastructure is critical to reducing health inequities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support SDOH-informed multidisciplinary care now; leaves open standardized implementation, reimbursement, and equity-centered trials.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review examines how social determinants of health contribute to inequities in cardiovascular outcomes and evaluates strategies for delivering equity-centered cardiovascular care across clinical, community, and policy settings. RECENT FINDINGS: Socioeconomic status, education, housing, food security, transportation, and insurance status significantly shape cardiovascular risk and care delivery. Multidisciplinary approaches integrating medical care with social support and community partnerships demonstrate promise in addressing these barriers. The Heart Team model, shared decision making, and quality improvement frameworks align clinical care with patient context. Evidence-based interventions including community-based programs, mobile health services, transportation assistance, and digital health tools improve cardiovascular access and outcomes among underserved populations. Addressing social and structural barriers is essential for reducing preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Future priorities include standardizing social risk data collection, expanding multidisciplinary care reimbursement, implementing equity-centered trial designs, and developing digital infrastructure supporting integrated care delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tasdighi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: