Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights socioeconomic, geographic, and political disparities in access to interventional cardiology procedures and proposes solutions to bridge the gap.
Despite significant advancements in interventional cardiology, including PCI, TAVI, and other structural heart interventions, access to these life-saving procedures remains uneven across the globe. This viewpoint highlights how socioeconomic, geographic, and political disparities impact clinical decision-making, outcomes, and professional well-being. Drawing from real-world experience and health systems analysis, the article explores the multifaceted barriers that hinder equitable care-ranging from health literacy and rural access to workforce shortages and regulatory or reimbursement challenges. It further discusses the psychological burden on clinicians caused by moral distress and limited resources. Potential solutions, including telemedicine, decentralized training, public awareness campaigns, and policy advocacy, are proposed to bridge the gap and promote a more just and inclusive landscape in interventional cardiology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kałużna‐Oleksy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: