Key result
Low socioeconomic position and adverse social determinants of health are associated with lower utilization rates, delayed access, and worse clinical outcomes for coronary and structural interventions.
Why the study?
Inequitable access and significant disparities have affected patients from low socioeconomic positions despite advancements in coronary and structural heart disease interventions.
Does low socioeconomic position reduce access to and worsen outcomes of coronary and structural interventions in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Does low socioeconomic position reduce access to and worsen outcomes of coronary and structural interventions in patients with cardiovascular disease?
This review highlights profound inequities in advanced cardiovascular care and calls for multifaceted, systemic interventions to ensure equitable access and outcomes.
Disparities warrant systemic efforts to improve equitable access; leaves open causal mechanisms and effective interventions in prospective studies.
In the past few decades, the accelerated improvement in technology has allowed the development of new and effective coronary and structural heart disease interventions. There has been inequitable patient access to these advanced therapies and significant disparities have affected patients from low socioeconomic positions. In the US, these disparities mostly affect women, black and hispanic communities who are overrepresented in low socioeconomic. Other adverse social determinants of health influenced by structural racism have also contributed to these disparities. In this article, we review the literature on disparities in access and use of coronary and structural interventions; delineate the possible reasons underlying these disparities; and highlight potential solutions at the government, healthcare system, community and individual levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bullock-Palmer et al. (2022) conducted a review in Coronary and structural heart disease. Low socioeconomic position and adverse social determinants of health vs. Higher socioeconomic position was evaluated. Low socioeconomic position and adverse social determinants of health are associated with lower utilization rates, delayed access, and worse clinical outcomes for coronary and structural interventions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: