Key result
Mechanical thrombectomy in mild stroke yields ~77% excellent 90-day outcomes, but extra passes increase neurological deterioration.
Why the study?
Is mechanical thrombectomy effective and safe in patients with mild stroke (NIHSS≤5) due to large-vessel occlusion?
Cohort (n=1,360)
Is mechanical thrombectomy effective and safe in patients with mild stroke (NIHSS≤5) due to large-vessel occlusion?
Mechanical thrombectomy is effective and safe in mild stroke patients with large vessel occlusion, though increased passes and procedure time predict early neurological deterioration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hohenstatt et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Mild acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion (n=1,360). Mechanical thrombectomy vs. Moderate-severe stroke (NIHSS>5) was evaluated on Excellent functional outcomes (mRS 0-1) at 90 days. Mechanical thrombectomy in mild stroke yielded 77.1% excellent functional outcomes at 90 days, though total passes predicted early neurological deterioration (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.01-2.19; P=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: