Comparative clinical evaluation reveals disparate lesion resolution despite similar skin drug exposure and parasite reduction, indicating baseline disease drives regional outcome differences.
BACKGROUND: Treatment regimens and clinical outcomes for post-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) vary across South Asia and Eastern Africa. We evaluated the skin target site pharmacokinetics (PK) of miltefosine, liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) and paromomycin and associated pharmacodynamics (PD) on skin parasite reduction and lesion healing, to determine PK/PD factors driving regional differences in clinical outcomes. METHODS: of Leishmania donovani to assess PK target attainment, then correlated with skin parasite load and lesion score to evaluate pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships. RESULTS: Antileishmanial drug distribution varied in skin. Miltefosine showed the highest skin-to-plasma ratio, with medians of 1.19 (IQR: 0.78-1.88) in South Asia vs. 1.58 (1.1-2.08) in Eastern Africa (P < 0.05). Combining paromomycin or LAmB with miltefosine improved PK target attainment and reduced variability. In South Asia, macular or mixed (macular and papular/nodular) lesions predominated (93%) and were associated with ≥6-fold higher baseline parasite load and lesion score versus Eastern Africa, where papular and maculopapular lesions were more common (97%). By treatment end, parasite loads dropped ≥99% in both regions, with ≤7% above the transmission threshold. Lesion scores decreased by 11% in South Asia and 93% in Eastern Africa. CONCLUSIONS: Similar skin PK target attainment and relative parasite reduction were achieved for all regimens. Regional differences in parasite load and lesion score at baseline and lesion healing rates, suggest disease presentation is the primary factor affecting clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: