Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
One of the main tenets of transformational grammar is that movement processes affect heads and phrases in different ways. In this article, I argue against this claim and propose that heads should be allowed to move in the same way as phrases. Conceptually, this proposal is the logical consequence of a common set of assumptions about syntax in general and movement in particular. Empirically, it finds support in the Spanish predicate cleft construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luis Cuadrado de Vicente (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: