Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 30, 2010European Heart JournalOpen Access

Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART)

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

DTDavid P. TaggartDADouglas G. AltmanAGAlastair Gray

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Taggart et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a80ff3aba5888e95f4d67dchttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq318
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease2009 · 4,380 citations
  2. 2Protocol for the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). A randomised trial to compare survival following bilateral versus single internal mammary grafting in coronary revascularisation [ISRCTN46552265]2006 · 115 citations
  3. 3Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: Angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years1996 · 1,364 citations
  4. 4Coronary Bypass Surgery with Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts — Effects on Survival over a 15-Year Period1996 · 889 citations
  5. 5Thirty‐Year Experience with Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?2009 · 25 citations