Why the study?
Does a physician-focused educational intervention improve blood pressure control in primary care patients?
Does a physician-focused educational intervention improve blood pressure control in primary care patients?
A physician-focused educational intervention improved the implementation of practice strategies but failed to significantly improve patient blood pressure control at 5 months.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not improve BP control despite better implementation; challenges efficacy of physician education for hypertension management.
BACKGROUND: To improve hypertension control, this cluster randomized trial evaluated the effectiveness of physician manager education about hypertension management. METHODS: After randomization at practice level, primary care physicians of the intervention arm, whose practices collaborated with a university department, participated in a three-session education on evidence-based hypertensiology and practice implementation strategies. The primary outcome was blood pressure (BP) control (ambulatory blood pressure [ABP] <130/80 mmHg) after 5 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in BP and practice routines regarding hypertension management. Following an intention-to-treat approach, data analyses included crude and adjusted generalized mixed models and sensitivity analyses. These took into account sex, age, ≥ hypertension-related disease and resistant hypertension (RH). RESULTS: The analysis included 103 of 169 patients from 22 practices. Overall, BP decrease was -8.2 systolic and -4.1 mmHg diastolic. The intervention had no effect on BP control (odds ratio 0.84 [95% CI 0.29-2.43]) and BP changes (interventional effect: systolic -2.48 mmHg [95% CI -7.24 to 2.29], diastolic -0.25 mmHg [95% CI 3.31 to 2.82]). Sensitivity analysis indicated effect modification in patients with RH. Intervention practices requested educational input on difficult cases, and newly implemented 3 practice strategies (14.5±2.6 versus 11.4±2.2; P=0.005). CONCLUSION: After the short follow-up of 5 months, the intervention had no impact on BP control but improved the use of practice strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weltermann et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: