Key result
Lower-frequency ventilation boosts SBP by ~19 mmHg and improves hemodynamics in severe hemorrhage.
Why the study?
The study aimed to explicitly demonstrate whether lower-frequency positive-pressure ventilation preserves oxygenation and acid-base status while normal or higher respiratory rates compromise hemodynamics during moderate hemorrhage.
Does lower-frequency positive-pressure ventilation (6 breaths/min) compared to normal or higher respiratory rates (12, 20, and 30 breaths/min) preserve oxygenation and improve hemodynamics in a porcine model of moderate hemorrhage?
Does lower-frequency positive-pressure ventilation (6 breaths/min) compared to normal or higher respiratory rates (12, 20, and 30 breaths/min) preserve oxygenation and improve hemodynamics in a porcine model of moderate hemorrhage?
In a porcine model of moderate hemorrhage, lower-frequency positive-pressure ventilation (6 breaths/min) preserves oxygenation and acid-base balance while significantly improving blood pressure, coronary perfusion pressure, and cardiac output compared to higher respiratory rates.
Objective Our goal was to demonstrate explicitly that lower-frequency positive-pressure ventilation not only preserves adequate oxygenation and acid-base status in hemorrhagic states, but also that "normal" or higher respiratory rates significantly compromise hemodynamics, even with moderate degrees of hemorrhage. Design and subjects Eight intubated pigs (ventilated with 12 mL/kg tidal volume, 28% FIO2, respiratory rate = 12 breaths/min) were hemorrhaged to <65 mm Hg of systolic blood pressure. Respiratory rates were then sequentially changed every 10 mins to 6, 20, 30, and 6 breaths/min. Measurements and main results With respiratory rates at 6 breaths/min, all subjects maintained pH of >7.25 and SaO2 of >99% while increasing systolic blood pressure (mean, 65-84 mm Hg; p < .05), time-averaged coronary perfusion pressure (50 +/- 2 to 60 +/- 4 mm Hg; p < .05), and cardiac output (2.4 to 2.8 L/min; p < .05). With respiratory rates of 20 and 30 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure (73 +/- 4 and 66 +/- 5 mm Hg, respectively), coronary perfusion pressure (47 +/- 3 and 42 +/- 4 mm Hg), and cardiac output (2.5 and 2.4 L/min) diminished. When returned to 6 breaths/min, systolic blood pressure (95 mm Hg), coronary perfusion pressure (71 + 6 mm Hg), and cardiac output (3.0 L/min) improved significantly (p < .05 for all comparisons). Conclusions After moderate hemorrhage, animals maintain adequate oxygenation and acid-base status with lower-frequency respiratory rates, whereas increasingly higher respiratory rates progressively and significantly impair hemodynamics. Current ventilatory protocols for trauma resuscitation should be re-examined and considered a possible cause of worsened clinical outcomes and unrecognized confounded study results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pepe et al. (2004) studied Hemorrhagic state (n=8). Lower-frequency positive-pressure ventilation vs. Higher respiratory rates (12, 20, and 30 breaths/min) was evaluated on Hemodynamic parameters (systolic blood pressure, time-averaged coronary perfusion pressure, and cardiac output), oxygenation (SaO2), and acid-base status (pH) (p=<0.05). Lower-frequency ventilation (6 breaths/min) significantly improved SBP (65 to 84 mm Hg), coronary perfusion pressure (50 to 60 mm Hg), and cardiac output (2.4 to 2.8 L/min; all p<0.05) in hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: