Why the study?
The COVID-19 pandemic created a need for practical knowledge and guidance to assist clinicians in the diagnosis and management of CVD associated with COVID-19.
This ESC guidance document provides practical knowledge for the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of cardiovascular conditions in patients with COVID-19.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support interim CVD pathways in COVID-19; leaves open prospective trials to confirm the narrative synthesis.
AIMS: Since its emergence in early 2020, the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has reached pandemic levels, and there have been repeated outbreaks across the globe. The aim of this two-part series is to provide practical knowledge and guidance to aid clinicians in the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in association with COVID-19. METHODS AND RESULTS: A narrative literature review of the available evidence has been performed, and the resulting information has been organized into two parts. The first, reported here, focuses on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of cardiovascular (CV) conditions that may be manifest in patients with COVID-19. The second part, which will follow in a later edition of the journal, addresses the topics of care pathways, treatment, and follow-up of CV conditions in patients with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive review is not a formal guideline but rather a document that provides a summary of current knowledge and guidance to practicing clinicians managing patients with CVD and COVID-19. The recommendations are mainly the result of observations and personal experience from healthcare providers. Therefore, the information provided here may be subject to change with increasing knowledge, evidence from prospective studies, and changes in the pandemic. Likewise, the guidance provided in the document should not interfere with recommendations provided by local and national healthcare authorities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baigent et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: