Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper analyses two Official Reports on law and order. They confront legitimation deficits, seeking discursively to redeem them by denial of their material geneses. This denial establishes an absence in the discourse. This absence, the Other, is the silence of a world constituted by material relations whose reality cannot be appropriated by a mode of normative argument which speaks to and from its own self-image via an idealised conception of justice. The paper discusses first the Reports' discursive problems, secondly, the disparate jurisprudential knowledges realised by the texts, and lastly the discursive presentation of these knowledges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burton et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: