This review presents standardized experimental protocols for evaluating dental zirconia ceramics in 10 critical areas : density, composition, translucency, crystallography, microstructure, surface roughness, flexural strength, fracture toughness, low-temperature degradation (LTD), and bonding. Density is measured using the liquid displacement method (ISO 18754 : 2020), suitable for irregularly shaped specimens. Elemental composition is analyzed using XRF, SEM-EDS/EPMA, or ICP-AES, depending on the required accuracy and spatial resolution. Translucency is assessed using the CIELAB-based translucency parameter. Crystalline phases are identified via XRD and quantified through Rietveld refinement, which also provided estimates of lattice parameters and yttria content. Microstructural analysis is performed using SEM and image analysis to determine grain size. Surface roughness is quantified using both two- and three-dimensional parameters according to established procedures. Flexural strength is evaluated using biaxial or uniaxial (3- or 4-point bending) tests, with Weibull analysis used to assess reliability. Consistent specimen preparation, including polishing is essential for accuracy. Fracture toughness is measured using indentation fracture, single-edge V-notch beam, or chevron notched beam (CNB) methods, with CNB preferred for fine-grained ceramics. LTD is assessed through autoclave aging, and phase transformation is monitored using XRD. Monoclinic content is quantified using the Garvie and Nicholson method to model LTD kinetics. Bonding performance is evaluated through shear and tensile bond strength tests after resin cementation, with thermal cycling to simulate intraoral aging conditions. These protocols ensure reproducible standardized data, enabling reliable comparison of dental zirconia materials across different studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inokoshi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: