Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The α-Na0.4R0.6F2.2 crystals (R = Ho–Lu, Y) were studied by X-ray diffraction analysis at 293 and 85 K. A unified cluster model of nanostructured crystals with a fluorite-type structure based on the polymorphism of KR3F10 (R = Er, Yb) was used to model their defect structure. The α-Na0.4R0.6F2.2 matrix component contained Na+ and R3+ in a ratio of 1 : 1. Part of the matrix anions was shifted from 8c to 32f position (sp. gr. Fm3m). Excess R3+ cations formed with Na+ octa-cubic clusters with nuclei in the form of cuboctahedra {F12} formed by interstitial anions at the 48i position. The α-Na0.4R0.6F2.2 cluster component was formed by octa-cubic clusters of type i. The electron diffraction method showed that the clusters had the shape of plates about 5 nm thick with superstructural ordering. Their structural model based on the K0.265Gd0.735F2.47 structure was proposed. For the first time, experimental confirmation of the affiliation of α-Na0.5–xR0.5+xF2+2x to nanostructured crystals was obtained by electron diffraction. When the temperature decreases from 293 to 85 K, the type of cluster component of the defect α-Na0.4R0.6F2.2 structure with R = Ho–Lu, and Y was not change. At 293 K, the boundary of the type change of the defect structure in the α-Na0.5–xR0.5+xF2+2x series was located between R = Dy (with the Z = 66 atomic number) and Ho (with Z = 67). When the temperature drops from 293 to 85 K, the position of the boundary was not change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sulyanova et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: