Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Soil health is an important concept in promoting sustainable agriculture and food security, yet the absence of universally accepted benchmarks limits its utility in assessing soil function. This study explored the use of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) soils as a potential benchmark to quantify the soil health gap (SHG) in Faribault County, Minnesota. Using the Soil Management Assessment Framework (SMAF), we evaluated physical, chemical, biological, and nutrient soil health indicators to derive a combined overall score that was used to quantify the SHG (i.e., benchmark soil minus test soil) between CRP and corn-based agricultural production (AP). Three paired farms were assessed, each consisting of CRP tall grass prairie established in 2001 and adjacent long-term AP. The results showed higher overall SMAF scores in CRP soils, with a mean SHG of 0.09. Land use had a strong influence on overall scores, largely driven by biological indicators such as soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and β-glucosidase activity. However, the SMAF demonstrated limited applicability in CRP systems, potentially under-representing their soil health status due to the SMAF’s agricultural emphasis and lack of ecosystem-specific factors such as pH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: