Why the study?
Detection of asymptomatic AF is challenging despite its major impact on morbidity and mortality.
Does a medical wearable using photoplethysmography accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to ECG Holter in hospitalized patients?
Does a medical wearable using photoplethysmography accurately detect atrial fibrillation compared to ECG Holter in hospitalized patients?
A photoplethysmography-based medical wearable using a deep neural network can reliably detect atrial fibrillation in hospitalized, physically active patients.
Hypothesis-generating for PPG wearables in AF detection among inpatients; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and has a major impact on morbidity and mortality; however, detection of asymptomatic AF is challenging. This study sims to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive AF detection by a medical wearable. In this observational trial, patients with AF admitted to a hospital carried the wearable and an ECG Holter (control) in parallel over a period of 24 h, while not in a physically restricted condition. The wearable with a tight-fit upper armband employs a photoplethysmography technology to determine pulse rates and inter-beat intervals. Different algorithms (including a deep neural network) were applied to five-minute periods photoplethysmography datasets for the detection of AF. A total of 2306 h of parallel recording time could be obtained in 102 patients; 1781 h (77.2%) were automatically interpretable by an algorithm. Sensitivity to detect AF was 95.2% and specificity 92.5% (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) 0.97). Usage of deep neural network improved the sensitivity of AF detection by 0.8% (96.0%) and specificity by 6.5% (99.0%) (AUC 0.98). Detection of AF by means of a wearable is feasible in hospitalized but physically active patients. Employing a deep neural network enables reliable and continuous monitoring of AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobsen et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: