Why the study?
Does 1 hour of reperfusion provide equivalent assessment of infarct size and cardiodynamics compared to 2 hours of reperfusion in isolated ischemic rat hearts?
Does 1 hour of reperfusion provide equivalent assessment of infarct size and cardiodynamics compared to 2 hours of reperfusion in isolated ischemic rat hearts?
One hour of reperfusion is sufficient to assess infarct size and cardiodynamics in both regional and global ischemic isolated rat heart models, offering a more time-efficient experimental protocol.
May support time-efficient 1-hour reperfusion protocols in isolated rat hearts; hypothesis-generating and leaves open clinical translation.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether 1 hour reperfusion is enough to assess cardiodynamics and infarct size in both regional ischemia (RI) and global ischemia (GI) in isolated rat heart models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hearts were randomly assigned to one of the following groups (each n=14): 1) Sham hearts for 1 hour; 2) Sham hearts for 2 hours; 3) 30 minutes RI followed by 1 hour reperfusion; 4) 30 minutes of RI followed by 2 hours reperfusion; 5) 30 minutes GI followed by 1 hour reperfusion; and 6) 30 minutes GI followed by 2 hours reperfusion. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in infarct size between 1 hour and 2 hours reperfusion in both RI and GI. Left ventricular developed pressure was significantly decreased at both 1 hour and 2 hours reperfusion in groups of RI and GI compared to baseline (p<0.01). Rate-pressure product and +dP/dt(max) also significantly decreased compared to baseline level at both 1 hour and 2 hours reperfusion in groups of RI and GI (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in infarct size between 1 hour and 2 hours reperfusion in groups of RI and GI. Cardiodynamic variables measured at 1 hour and 2 hours reperfusion significantly decreased compared to baseline level. Our data suggests that reperfusion of 1 hour is sufficient to assess cardiodynamics in both regional and global ischemic isolated hearts model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: