Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Magnetic resonance (MR) images generated by different scanners generally have inconsistent contrast properties, making it difficult to perform a combined quantitative analysis of images from a range of scanners. In this study, we aimed to develop an automatic brain image segmentation model to provide a more reliable analysis of MR images taken with different scanners. Methods: The spatially localized atlas network tiles-27 (SLANT-27) deep learning model was used to train the automatic segmentation module, based on a multi-center dataset of 1,917 three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted MR images. Subsequently, a framework called Qbrain, consisting of a new generative adversarial network (GAN) image transfer module and the SLANT-27 segmentation module, was developed. Another 3D T1-weighted MRI interscan dataset of 48 participants who were scanned in 3 MRI scanners (1.5T Siemens Avanto, 3T Siemens Trio Tim, and 3T Philips Ingenia) on the same day was used to train and test the Qbrain model. Volumetric T1-weighted images were processed with Qbrain, SLANT-27, and FreeSurfer (FS). The automatic segmentation reliability across the scanners was assessed using test-retest variability (TRV). Results: . 3T Philips scanners was reduced by 1.57%, 2.01%, and 0.56%, respectively. In addition, the segmentation model improved intra-scanner variability (0.9-1.67%) compared with that of FS (2.47-4.32%). Conclusions: The newly developed QBrain method combined with GAN image transfer module and a SLANT-27 segmentation module was shown to improve the reliability of whole-brain automatic structural segmentation results across multiple scanners, thus representing a suitable alternative quantitative method of comparative brain tissue analysis for individual patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Niu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: