Why the study?
Does the ABPM 630 arm-cuff method differ from the BP-100 finger-volume oscillometric method in measuring nocturnal blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension?
Does the ABPM 630 arm-cuff method differ from the BP-100 finger-volume oscillometric method in measuring nocturnal blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension?
The arm-cuff ABPM device records significantly higher nocturnal blood pressure compared to the finger-volume device, likely due to sleep disturbance caused by cuff inflation.
Arm-cuff ABPM may overestimate nocturnal SBP via sleep disturbance; leaves open optimal device selection for accurate hypertension monitoring.
The nocturnal behaviour of blood pressure obtained by a new portable device for monitoring ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM 630) was compared with that obtained by a finger-volume oscillometric device (BP-100); the former uses a conventional arm-cuff inflated by CO2 gas to eliminate the noise of the motorized pump, and is based on a cuff-oscillometric as well as the Korotkoff sound technique (microphone method). With the microphone method in ABPM 630, the mean differences from the conventional auscultatory method were -0.28 +/- 6.15 mmHg (mean +/- s.d.) for systolic and 0.96 +/- 6.28 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and there was a highly significant correlation between blood pressure values measured by the ABPM 630 and by the auscultatory method. In 40 patients with mild to moderate hypertension 24-h blood pressure was monitored simultaneously with the ABPM 630 and BP-100. The daytime average of systolic blood pressure measured with the ABPM 630 was similar to that measured with the BP-100, whereas the night-time average assessed by the former was significantly higher than that assessed by the latter. Arm-cuff inflation by ABPM 630 caused some degree of sleep disturbance in 35 of 40 subjects, whereas finger-cuff inflation scarcely disturbed the sleep. The performance of the ABPM 630 was excellent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imai et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: