Why the study?
Guidance was needed to help clinicians select suitable haemodynamic monitoring techniques to optimize tissue perfusion and haemodynamics in individual perioperative patients.
This review provides guidance on selecting appropriate haemodynamic monitoring tools to assess fluid responsiveness and optimize cardiac function in perioperative and critically ill patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Trend analysis may guide haemodynamic monitoring without a gold standard; leaves open prospective validation studies.
Haemodynamic monitoring is the cornerstone in the optimization of tissue perfusion and the prevention of deteriorating metabolism. Haemodynamic alterations could be summarized in terms of cardiac dysfunction, changes of loading conditions (preload or/and afterload), and patient related issues. This review aims to present the clinical applications of different haemodynamic monitoring techniques, discuss advantages and disadvantages, and provide guidance to help the clinician select those techniques suitable to optimize haemodynamics in individual patients during the perioperative period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: