Why the study?
Inter-arm SBP difference predicts cardiovascular disease, but its relationship with central blood pressure needed to be determined.
Is an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference ≥10 mmHg associated with higher central blood pressure in a community cohort?
Is an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference ≥10 mmHg associated with higher central blood pressure in a community cohort?
An inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference of ≥10 mmHg is associated with elevated central blood pressure, suggesting a potential mechanism for its predictive value in cardiovascular disease.
May indicate higher central SBP in community patients; extends observational links but leaves open clinical utility.
OBJECTIVE: The inter-arm SBP difference (IASBPD) can serve as a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In this study, we aimed to determine the relationship between IASBPD and central blood pressure (CBP). METHODS: The study cohort comprised of 7842 eligible individuals. Their BPs were assessed simultaneously in both arms using an Omron BP-203RPEIII vascular profiler, and the IASBPD was measured as the absolute difference in these values (absolute value of left minus right). The CBP was noninvasively measured using an Omron HEM-9000AI device. Multivariate regression analysis was used to assess the association between the central SBP (cSBP) and the IASBPD. RESULTS: An IASBPD of ≥10 mmHg was positively associated with the cSBP (β = 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.48; P < 0.001). The interaction test showed no significant interactions between the IASBPD and any of the assessed covariates (age group; sex; BMI; smoking status; heart rate group; the presence of hypertension, diabetes, or CVD; and antihypertensive drug use) when the cSBP was used as the outcome in the subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION: The mechanism underlying the ability of the IASBPD to predict CVD may partly involve an increase in the CBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: