Why the study?
To evaluate CCTA-based endothelial wall shear stress in coronary arteries without atherosclerosis and assess factors affecting these values.
What are the normal values and factors affecting CCTA-based endothelial wall shear stress in coronary arteries without atherosclerosis?
What are the normal values and factors affecting CCTA-based endothelial wall shear stress in coronary arteries without atherosclerosis?
CCTA-based endothelial wall shear stress values in normal coronary arteries vary significantly by epicardial artery, sex, and lumen diameter, increasing rapidly in smaller segments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Normal CCTA-ESS values differ by diameter and vessel; supports refined reference ranges but leaves open prognostic utility.
Endothelial wall shear stress (ESS) is a biomechanical force which plays a role in the formation and evolution of atherosclerotic lesions. The purpose of this study is to evaluate coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-based ESS in coronary arteries without atherosclerosis, and to assess factors affecting ESS values. CCTA images from patients with suspected coronary artery disease were analyzed to identify coronary arteries without atherosclerosis. Minimal and maximal ESS values were calculated for 3-mm segments. Factors potentially affecting ESS values were examined, including sex, lumen diameter and distance from the ostium. Segments were categorized according to lumen diameter tertiles into small (< 2.6 mm), intermediate (2.6-3.2 mm) or large (≥ 3.2 mm) segments. A total of 349 normal vessels from 168 patients (mean age 59 ± 9 years, 39% men) were included. ESS was highest in the left anterior descending artery compared to the left circumflex artery and right coronary artery (minimal ESS 2.3 Pa vs. 1.9 Pa vs. 1.6 Pa, p < 0.001 and maximal ESS 3.7 Pa vs. 3.0 Pa vs. 2.5 Pa, p < 0.001). Men had lower ESS values than women, also after adjusting for lumen diameter (p < 0.001). ESS values were highest in small segments compared to intermediate or large segments (minimal ESS 3.8 Pa vs. 1.7 Pa vs. 1.2 Pa, p < 0.001 and maximal ESS 6.0 Pa vs. 2.6 Pa vs. 2.0 Pa, p < 0.001). A weak to strong correlation was found between ESS and distance from the ostium (ρ = 0.22-0.62, p < 0.001). CCTA-based ESS values increase rapidly and become widely scattered with decreasing lumen diameter. This needs to be taken into account when assessing the added value of ESS beyond lumen diameter in highly stenotic lesions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schultz et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: