Why the study?
To examine the test re-test reliability of isometric maximal voluntary contractions of hip adduction, hip abduction, and multijoint leg extension in sub-elite female Australian footballers.
Isometric squat, hip abduction, and hip adduction tests demonstrate acceptable test-retest reliability for assessing peak force in sub-elite female Australian footballers.
Supports isometric strength testing in sub-elite female footballers; leaves open broader validation before routine clinical use.
Purpose To examine the test re-test reliability of isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) of hip adduction (ADD ISO ), hip abduction (ABD ISO ), and multijoint leg extension (SQUAT ISO ) in sub-elite female Australian footballers. Methods Data were collected from 24 sub-elite female Australian footballers (age 22.6 ± 4.5 years; height 169.4 ± 5.5 cm; body mass 66.6 ± 8.0 kg; 4.5 ± 4.4 years sport-specific training; 2.5 ± 2.0 years unstructured resistance training) from the same club on two non-consecutive days. Participants performed three isometric MVCs of ADD ISO , ABD ISO , and SQUAT ISO . The SQUAT ISO was performed at 140° knee flexion with a vertical trunk position and ADD ISO and ABD ISO measures were performed in a supine position at 60° of knee flexion and 60° hip flexion. Reliability was assessed using paired t tests and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), typical error (TE), and coefficient of variation (CV%) with 95% CI. Results SQUAT ISO peak force (ICC .95; CV% 4.1), ABD ISO for left, right, and sum (ICC .90–.92; CV% 5.0–5.7), and ADD ISO for left, right, and sum (ICC .86–.91; CV% 6.2–6.9) were deemed acceptably reliable based on predetermined criteria (ICC ≥ .8 and CV% ≤ 10). Conclusion SQUAT ISO , ABD ISO , and ADD ISO tests demonstrated acceptable reliability for the assessment of peak force in sub-elite female Australian footballers, suggesting these assessments are suitable for muscle strength testing and monitoring adaptations to training.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kadlec et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: