Why the study?
Does sacubitril-valsartan improve aortic stiffness compared to enalapril in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Does sacubitril-valsartan improve aortic stiffness compared to enalapril in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction?
Sacubitril-valsartan reduces aortic stiffness and central pressures more than enalapril in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sacubitril-valsartan over enalapril for central hemodynamics in HFrEF; extends outcome data to aortic stiffness effects.
Background: Treatment with sacubitril-valsartan reduces mortality and heart failure (HF) events in HF with reduced ejection fraction and may reduce HF hospitalization in women with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Methods: EVALUATE-HF randomized 464 participants (109 women) with HF with reduced ejection fraction to sacubitril-valsartan or enalapril for 12 weeks. Documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤0.40 within the prior 12 months was required, although core laboratory LVEF>0.40 was permitted. Assessments of aortic stiffness (pulse pressure and characteristic impedance, Z c ) were performed at baseline and at trough and 4 hours postdose at weeks 4 and 12. Results: In models of change from baseline adjusted for baseline value, treatment with sacubitril-valsartan produced greater overall reductions in mean arterial pressure (treatment group difference, −3.0±0.8 mm Hg, P <0.001) and pulse pressure (−3.0±0.8 mm Hg, P <0.001). Postdose reductions in Z c were greater in the sacubitril-valsartan group (−16±6 dyne×second/cm 5 , P =0.012). Post hoc analyses found evidence of effect modification by LVEF (interaction P =0.036). With LVEF<0.40, postdose reductions in Z c were greater in the sacubitril-valsartan group (trough, −3±8 dyne×second/cm 5 versus post-dose, −17±8 dyne×second/cm 5 ; interaction P =0.024) with no sex difference (treatment×sex interaction, P =0.3). With LVEF≥0.40, treatment with sacubitril-valsartan was associated with greater overall reductions in Z c in women (women, −80±21 dyne×second/cm 5 versus men, −20±13 dyne×second/cm 5 ; interaction P =0.019). Conclusions: In prespecified analyses that include pre- and postdose assessments at 4 and 12 weeks, treatment with sacubitril-valsartan was associated with greater postdose reductions in aortic Z c . In a post hoc analysis, sacubitril-valsartan was associated with sustained reductions in Z c in women with LVEF≥0.40. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT02874794.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitchell et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: