Why the study?
Standard anti-inflammatory therapies for acute and recurrent pericarditis have contraindications and adverse effects, prompting interest in interleukin-1 antagonists given the role of the inflammasome and similarities to other autoinflammatory diseases.
Do interleukin-1 blockers improve outcomes in patients with acute and recurrent pericarditis?
Do interleukin-1 blockers improve outcomes in patients with acute and recurrent pericarditis?
This review summarizes the state of the art and future directions for the use of interleukin-1 blockers in acute and recurrent pericarditis.
Limitations of standard anti-inflammatory therapies in pericarditis warrant caution; leaves open the role of targeted agents pending randomized trials.
Diseases of the pericardium encompass a spectrum of conditions, including acute and recurrent pericarditis, where inflammation plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and clinical manifestations. Anti-inflammatory therapy indeed forms the cornerstone of treating these conditions: NSAIDs, colchicine, and corticosteroids (as a second-line treatment) are recommended by current guidelines. However, these medications come with several contraindications and are not devoid of adverse effects. In recent years, there has been an increased focus on the role of the inflammasome and potential therapeutic targets. Recurrent pericarditis also shares numerous characteristics with other autoinflammatory diseases, in which interleukin-1 antagonists have already been employed with good efficacy and safety. The objective of this review is to summarize the available studies on the use of anti-IL-1 drugs both in acute and recurrent pericarditis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: