A new model of photosynthesis published recently in this journal (H. Farazdaghi & G. E. Edwards, Plant, Cell and Environment (1988) 11 , 789–798; 799–809) clams to have a more complete mechanistic basis than currently used models based on the paper of G. D. Farquhar, S. von Caemmerer & J. A. Berry ( Planta (1980) 149 , 78–90). In this paper, we examine the validity of the new kinetic expression for the rate of CO 2 fixation by Rubisco, and the derivation of an equation for photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation as a function of light intensity and CO 2 concentration presented in the new model. In addition, we compare measured response curve of photosynthesis to CO 2 and light with simulated curves using alternative models. We conclude that the new model is mechanistically misleading and, empirically, overestimates the extent to which light and CO 2 co‐limit the rate of photosynthesis under most physiological conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Collatz et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: