Why the study?
Does withdrawal of isoproterenol lead to regression of cardiac hypertrophy in adult female Wistar rats?
Does withdrawal of isoproterenol lead to regression of cardiac hypertrophy in adult female Wistar rats?
Isoproterenol-induced cardiac hypertrophy in rats is largely reversible upon withdrawal, though ventricular RNA content and heart weight remain slightly elevated compared to controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change clinical practice; leaves open applicability of recovery kinetics beyond rodent hypertrophy models.
Cardiac hypertrophy was induced in adult female Wistar rats after 8 days of daily subcutaneous injections of isoproterenol (ISO). Regression from hypertrophy was studied following 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 20 days of ISO withdrawal. After 8 days of treatment cardiac mass increased 40%. Following ISO withdrawal, ventricular regression occurred during the first 8 days. After 12-20 days of recovery, a new steady-state heart weight to body weight ratio was established that was 12-13% above the controls. The half-time recovery for heart weight was 3.8 days. Ventricular RNA content was stimulated 76% after 8 days of ISO-induced hypertrophy. During regression RNA content decreased rapidly during the first 8 days with a half-time of 3.4 days. Following 20 days of recovery ventricular RNA was still 31% above the controls. However, myocyte RNA was stimulated 86% following 8 days of ISO treatment and returned to control level after 12 days of regression. Myocardial DNA was increased 23% in the hypertrophied hearts and did not change during the recovery period. Hydroxyproline was increased in the ISO-treated hearts and decreased only slightly during the recovery interval. These data indicate that ISO-induced hypertrophy was reversible while ventricular RNA content only partially recovered. Nevertheless, myocyte RNA showed a large stimulation that was completely reversible at least after 12 days of recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: