Why the study?
What factors are associated with patient refusal to undergo repeat 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?
What factors are associated with patient refusal to undergo repeat 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring?
Most patients are willing to undergo repeat 24-hour ABPM, but device-related discomfort and sleep interference are significant factors for refusal, highlighting the need for technological improvements.
High acceptance supports ABPM feasibility in practice; observational data leave open whether lighter devices reduce refusal.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to find out factors associated with patient acceptance of repeat 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) using the Mobil-O-Graph ambulatory blood pressure monitor. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty patients had ABPM performed between July 1999 and Oct 2000. Following 24 h ABPM patients were asked to complete 13-item questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety-five percent of the patients were willing to have 24 h ABPM repeated. There was no relation to patient's refusal to further ABPM with gender, age, height, weight, BMI, arm circumference, clinic blood pressure or 24 h ABPM profile. Patients were unlikely to have 24 h ABPM repeated if they found the monitor heavy and cumbersome (68%), if the monitor interfered with sleep (45%), or if they were so disturbed by the 24 h ABPM that they considered switching the monitor off (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were willing to have repeat ABPM using the Mobil-O-Graph and reported few problems with monitor noise, heaviness and interference with sleep. These factors however still remain significant and need more technological attention and innovation from the manufacturers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elliot et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: