Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 12, 2017Critical CareOpen Access

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is superior to conventional oxygen therapy but not to noninvasive mechanical ventilation on intubation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

HZHuiying ZhaoSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityHWHuixia WangNantong UniversityFSFeng SunGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Zhao et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8150415f017ee9d49cd216https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1760-8
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Nasal High Flow and Respiratory Patterns: Determinants of Underlying Lung Functions - Are Complex Interactions Easily Controlled?2013 · 176 citations
  2. 2Use of high-flow nasal canulae: effect on alveolar pressure and its limitation2013 · 5 citations
  3. 3Heated and Humidified High-Flow Oxygen Therapy Reduces Discomfort During Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure2012 · 182 citations
  4. 4Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Noninvasive Ventilation on Reintubation and Postextubation Respiratory Failure in High-Risk Patients2016 · 633 citations
  5. 5Nasal High-Flow versus Venturi Mask Oxygen Therapy after Extubation. Effects on Oxygenation, Comfort, and Clinical Outcome2014 · 551 citations