Why the study?
Does elevated NT-proBNP predict adverse outcomes in cardiovascular outpatients with normal and abnormal echocardiography?
Does elevated NT-proBNP predict adverse outcomes in cardiovascular outpatients with normal and abnormal echocardiography?
Low NT-proBNP levels indicate an excellent prognosis in cardiovascular outpatients, regardless of whether echocardiographic abnormalities are present.
Normal NT-proBNP signals 0% events despite abnormal echocardiography in outpatients; supports risk stratification but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Outpatients frequently present with elevated natriuretic peptides in the absence of an obvious cardiac abnormality or with normal natriuretic peptides despite echocardiographic findings. HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine the prognostic value of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTpBNP) in outpatients with normal and abnormal echocardiography. METHODS: A total of 433 cardiovascular outpatients were included. The prognostic value of NTpBNP in patients with normal and abnormal echocardiography during a 2-year follow-up was evaluated. RESULTS: Patients with abnormal echocardiography and elevated NTpBNP had a mortality rate of 8.7% and an overall event rate of 20.2% (composite end point of overall mortality, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization for heart failure), which was significantly higher than in patients with abnormal echocardiography and normal NTpBNP, in which no mortality (P=0.011) and no events were observed (P<0.001). In patients with a normal echocardiography, mortality was 1.5% and 1.8% for patients with normal and elevated NTpBNP, respectively (P=1.000). Composite event rate was 1.5% and 8.9% (P=0.093), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low NTpBNP have an excellent prognosis irrespective of echocardiographic findings. Therefore, determination of NTpBNP appears useful in assessing the clinical relevance of echocardiographic findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toggweiler et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: