Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether active management of urinary tract infections (UTI) in young children by general practitioners can reduce kidney scarring rates. DESIGN: A comparison of two audits in Newcastle, of children aged <8 years, presenting with UTIs ; a retrospective audit of conventional management during 1992-1995 (1990s) versus a prospective audit of direct access management during 2004-2011 (2000s). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kidney scarring rates, and their relationship with time-to-treat. RESULTS: Children with a first UTI in the 2000s compared to those in the 1990s, were referred younger, were half as likely to have a renal scar (girls OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.76; boys 0.35, 0.16 to 0.81), and were about 12 times more likely to have vesicoureteric reflux without scarring (girls 11.9, 4.3 to 33.5; boys 14.4, 4.3 to 47.6). In the 2000s, general practitioners treated about half the children at first consultation. Children who were treated within 3 days of their symptoms starting were one-third as likely to scar as those whose symptoms lasted longer (0.33, 0.12 to 0.72). INTERPRETATION: Most kidney defects seen in children after UTIs, are acquired scars, and in Newcastle, active management in primary care has halved this rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coulthard et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: