KCB-328 unbinds from the resting state of IKr more readily than dofetilide, which may explain its less striking reverse frequency dependence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May attenuate reverse frequency dependence of IKr blockade in animals; leaves open clinical translation versus dofetilide.
A novel pure class III antiarrhythmic agent, 1-(2-amino-4-methanesulfonamidophenoxy)-2-[N-(3,4-dimethoxyphen-ethyl)-N-methylamino]ethane hydrochloride (KCB-328) prolongs action potential duration (APD) by blocking the rapid component delayed rectifier K+ current (IKr). However, KCB-328 manifests little of the reverse frequency dependence (RFD) that is a general characteristic of class III antiarrhythmic agents. We have studied the onset and recovery kinetics of KCB-328 and dofetilide on APD in guinea-pig papillary muscle and on human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) channel, which encodes IKr, expressed in Xenopus oocytes. KCB-328 (1 microM) and dofetilide (0.1 microM) progressively increased the duration of post-rest AP at 1-Hz stimulation, with onset time constants of 6.4 +/- 0.6 seconds and 20.7 +/- 1.8 seconds, respectively. With a 100-second resting period, the effect of KCB-328 recovered by 70% with a time constant of 13.2 +/- 4.2 seconds, whereas that of dofetilide recovered only by 25%. Both drugs blocked activated HERG channels in a biexponential decay fashion, with faster time constants for KCB-328 (3 microM) than for dofetilide (0.3 microM). After a 300-second resting period, HERG current inhibited by KCB-328 was recovered more at depolarized membrane potentials than at hyperpolarized ones, with a time constant of 179.9 seconds during the rest at -60 mV. In contrast, recovery after dofetilide was negligible at all voltages tested. These results suggest that KCB-328 binds to IKr at a preferentially open state in a use-dependent manner, but that KCB-328 unbinds from the resting state more readily than dofetilide. The less striking RFD of KCB-328 than of dofetilide might be related to the faster recovery from its effect on IKr.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: