Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new critical chapter in the long history of polemics about the concept of role has been written by some feminist sociologists. These authors point to a number of limitations in “the language of roles.” They charge that this approach “retains its functionalist roots,” focuses more on individuals than on social structure, and has other flaws. Having assessed the validity of these critiques, this article examines some recent alternative conceptualizations of gender. The comparative analysis concludes that each of the proposed conceptualizations illuminates some selected features, but none, including the role perspective, can serve as an all-inclusive paradigm for the study of gender.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirra Komarovsky (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: