Why the study?
Are serum ADMA levels higher in patients with primary aldosteronism compared to those with essential hypertension or healthy controls?
Are serum ADMA levels higher in patients with primary aldosteronism compared to those with essential hypertension or healthy controls?
Endothelial dysfunction in primary aldosteronism, as measured by ADMA levels, appears related to hypertension itself rather than the specific etiology of elevated blood pressure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ADMA elevation in PA versus controls but not EH suggests hypertension-driven endothelial dysfunction; hypothesis-generating for subtype-specific mechanisms.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have revealed a higher rate of cardiovascular complications in primary aldosteronism (PA) compared to patients with essential hypertension (EH). Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is a marker of endothelial dysfunction that could contribute to increased cardiovascular risk in patients with PA. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the levels of ADMA among patients with PA, controls with EH and healthy participants. Methods: Serum ADMA levels were determined, using commercially available competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. METHODS: Serum ADMA levels were determined, using commercially available competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Patients with PA had significantly higher concentrations of ADMA than healthy controls (0.488 ± 0.085 vs. 0.433 ± 0.053 μmol/L, P = 0.027). No difference was found in ADMA levels between cases with PA and EH (0.488 ± 0.085 vs. 0.476 ± 0.075 μmol/L, р = 0.636). The difference between patients with EH and normotensive controls did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The lack of difference between ADMA levels in patients with PA and EH suggests that endothelial dysfunction is more likely related to hypertension per se than to the specific etiology of elevated blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matrozova et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: