Why the study?
Although evidence exists for initial left ventricular thrombus treatment, the subsequent management of these patients is less well-defined.
Does anticoagulation with warfarin or DOACs improve outcomes in patients with left ventricular thrombus?
Does anticoagulation with warfarin or DOACs improve outcomes in patients with left ventricular thrombus?
This review proposes a practical algorithm for LVT management, suggesting similar efficacy between warfarin and DOACs and providing guidance on persistent or resolved LVT with high-risk features.
Supports DOAC-warfarin equivalence for LVT with resolution-based guidance; extends evidence via a practical management algorithm.
Although there is established evidence for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) at the outset, the subsequent management of these patients is less well-defined. This review discusses the currently available evidence for the initial type and duration of anticoagulation for LVT and explores potential treatment options after the initial period of anticoagulation. Of 2,052 studies screened, 32 studies (with three randomised controlled trials) were included. The initial anticoagulation strategy was either warfarin or direct oral anticoagulants, with the majority of studies showing similar outcomes. If LVT persists, studies recommended continuing anticoagulation (n=11/17) or switching to a different class of anticoagulant (n=7/17). After resolution, five studies recommended continuing anticoagulation in the presence of high-risk features of recurrence (i.e. persistently depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and/or apical wall dyskinesia). Medical management should be optimised, together with the appropriate revascularisation strategy, as clinically indicated. Synthesising the evidence, a practical algorithm for the management of LVT is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: