Why the study?
Does metabolic syndrome increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in non-diabetic postmenopausal women?
Does metabolic syndrome increase the risk of coronary atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness in non-diabetic postmenopausal women?
In non-diabetic postmenopausal women, metabolic syndrome is significantly associated with increased arterial stiffness and a more than twofold higher odds of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.
May warrant closer monitoring in postmenopausal women; hypothesis-generating for intervention trials in this subgroup.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the possible association of metabolic syndrome with arterial stiffness and coronary atherosclerosis in non-diabetic, postmenopausal women. METHODS: A total of 293 non-diabetic, postmenopausal women who visited the health promotion center for a routine health check-up were included in a cross-sectional study. Arterial stiffness was measured by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, and coronary atherosclerosis was detected using 64-row multi-detector computed tomography. RESULTS: Women with coronary atherosclerosis had a significantly higher proportion of metabolic syndrome than those without coronary atherosclerosis. The brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was significantly higher in women who had metabolic syndrome compared to those who had no metabolic syndrome (1567.71 ± 211.81 vs. 1336.75 ± 159.62 cm/s, p < 0.001). In addition, the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity was shown to increase with increasing number of metabolic syndrome components (p for trend < 0.001). Metabolic syndrome was associated with increased risk of coronary atherosclerosis (adjusted odds ratio 2.38; 95% confidence interval 1.01-5.06), after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women. Increased arterial stiffness may partly explain an increased risk of coronary atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yun et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: