Why the study?
Incidentally discovered intracardiac masses often represent diagnostic dilemmas, and no guideline-directed algorithm exists for their evaluation and management.
Multimodality imaging is crucial for evaluating incidentally discovered intracardiac masses, as benign tumors can grow rapidly and mimic malignancy or thrombus.
Rapid intracardiac mass growth warrants multimodality imaging before presuming malignancy; case reports leave open prospective diagnostic validation.
Incidentally discovered intracardiac masses often represent diagnostic dilemmas. No guideline-directed algorithm exists for evaluation and management in these cases. Understanding the utility and limitations of different imaging modalities expedites evaluation of differential diagnoses and management, particularly when there are discordant imaging findings. This case further demonstrates that benign cardiac tumors may grow rapidly, and that new and rapid emergence of an intracardiac mass does not necessarily correlate with a diagnosis of thrombus or malignancy. It also highlights the importance of a broad differential diagnosis and a systematic management approach in patients with intracardiac masses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saef et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: