Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the long-term survival and success rates of implants and screw-retained, full-arch prostheses placed in edentulous maxillae over 8 years of function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 106 Astra Tech implants were placed in the maxillae of 17 edentulous patients in a one-stage surgical approach. After a healing period of 6 months, the patients received fixed screw-retained bridges. Follow-up visits, including clinical and radiographic examinations, were performed after 6 months and at yearly intervals. Implant survival, implant success, and marginal bone-level changes were defined as the primary outcome variables. The secondary aims were to report periodontal pathogens at 5 years' follow-up and patients' satisfaction at the 8-year follow-up. RESULTS: The overall observation time was 8 years. One patient died during the study and one implant failed during the healing period, yielding an 8-year cumulative implant survival rate of 99%. The prosthetic survival rate was 100%. The mean crestal bone loss amounted to 0.3 ± 0.72 mm. Patients' subjective evaluations demonstrated an overall high level of satisfaction. In all cases, except for one, microbiologic probing of the peri-implant sulcus after 5 years showed no higher incidence of periodontal pathogens. CONCLUSIONS: Screw-retained, full-arch restorations on six implants in an edentulous maxilla are a predictable and highly successful treatment concept as observed throughout this study with an observation period of 8 years of function, in particular with respect to low crestal bone loss and high patient satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mertens et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: