Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objectives The goals of the study were to revise the Sensory Eating Problem Scale (SEPS) to smell items and to develop cut-off scores for this measure.Methods Participants included 428 children referred to a feeding clinic and a comparison sample of 136 children who had not received feeding therapy. Factor analysis was used to develop a new smell subscale. ROC analysis was used to develop cut-off scores. Validity testing was conducted by comparing the scores of the clinical and non-clinical groups on the revised SEPS on four additional measures including measures of diet variety, texture, oral behaviors, and mealtime behaviors.Results Factor analysis resulted in a 3-item measure of smell sensitivity. Three items previously included in the original SEPS were eliminated due to inadequate factor loadings resulting in a 22-item revised measure. Using SEPS-R mean cutoff score of 1.52 (out of 5), 88% of children referred to the feeding program and 12% of children in the control sample were identified with sensory eating problems. Children identified with a sensory feeding problem ate fewer foods and had more problems with texture, oral behaviors, mealtime behaviors than controls.Conclusions The SEPS-R was able to accurately identify children with sensory feeding problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: