Why the study?
The antiplatelet effect of prasugrel for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack remains unclear.
Does prasugrel with aspirin reduce platelet reaction units compared to clopidogrel with aspirin in patients with acute large artery atherosclerosis or high-risk TIA?
Does prasugrel with aspirin reduce platelet reaction units compared to clopidogrel with aspirin in patients with acute large artery atherosclerosis or high-risk TIA?
Prasugrel provides more potent and stable inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel at 5 days in patients with acute LAA or high-risk TIA, regardless of CYP2C19 metabolizer status.
Supports prasugrel for greater platelet inhibition in acute LAA or high-risk TIA; confirms pharmacodynamic superiority over clopidogrel in this setting.
BACKGROUND: The antiplatelet effect of prasugrel for acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) remains unclear. This study compared platelet reactivity between prasugrel and clopidogrel, considering cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C member 19 (CYP2C19) gene polymorphisms (extensive metabolizers [EM], intermediate metabolizers [IM], and poor metabolizers [PM]), in patients with acute large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) or high-risk TIA. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter open-label randomized controlled study, patients with acute LAA or high-risk TIA received prasugrel or clopidogrel with aspirin. The primary endpoint was platelet reaction units (PRU) 5 days after the start of drug administration, stratified according to CYP2C19 polymorphism. In all, 176 patients participated (88 in each group). Compared with the clopidogrel group, PRU on Day 5 in the prasugrel group were significantly lower in the overall population (adjusted mean 136.0 vs. 169.9; estimated difference -33.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] -49.0, -18.8), EM group (118.5 vs. 144.8; estimated difference -26.2; 95% CI -48.0, -4.4), and IM group (140.3 vs. 173.1; estimated difference -32.8; 95% CI -56.6, -9.0), and tended to be lower in the PM group (164.7 vs. 196.2; estimated difference -31.6; 95% CI -68.3, 5.1). The prevalence of new infarct lesions was comparable between the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups, as was the incidence of adverse events (30.7% vs. 26.1%, respectively) and bleeding events up to Day 5 of administration. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute LAA or high-risk TIA, prasugrel resulted in stable inhibition of platelet aggregation 5 days after starting drug administration compared with clopidogrel, regardless of CYP2C19 polymorphisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujimoto et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: