Key result
Prasugrel successfully overcame high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in the acute phase of ACS, sharply reducing median platelet reactivity index from 70.0% to 11.9% at 24 hours and maintaining antiplatelet potency at 30 days.
Why the study?
Does switching to prasugrel improve platelet inhibition in ACS patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity on clopidogrel undergoing PCI?
Cohort (n=71)
Open-label
Non-randomized
No
Does switching to prasugrel improve platelet inhibition in ACS patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity on clopidogrel undergoing PCI?
Switching to prasugrel effectively overcomes high on-treatment platelet reactivity in ACS patients pretreated with clopidogrel and maintains its antiplatelet effect up to 30 days.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support prasugrel switch for high on-clopidogrel reactivity in ACS; leaves open effects on ischemic events.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess antiplatelet effect of prasugrel in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel, undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A prospective, platelet reactivity-guided, parallel-group, open-label study including 71 patients pretreated with clopidogrel 600 mg and assigned either to prasugrel (30 mg loading dose, 10 mg maintenance dose; n = 46) or clopidogrel (150 mg maintenance dose for 6 days and thereafter 75 mg maintenance dose; n = 25) regimen, based on vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP)-assessed platelet reactivity index (PRI; > 50% vs. ≤ 50%) measured next morning post-PCI. RESULTS: Median PRI value after switch to prasugrel sharply declined at 24 h (70.0 [61.3-75.6] vs. 11.9 [6.8-25.7]%; p < 0.000001) and slightly but significantly rose between 24 h and 30 days (27.9 [15.5-46.8]%; p < 0.0006). In contrast, median PRI values in the clopidogrel group were similar at baseline and at 24 h (25.1 [13.7-40.2] vs. 22.0 [18.4-36.8]%; p = NS) and then modestly rose at 30 days (30.3 [20.4-45.7]%; p < 0.03). The prevalence of HTPR decreased in the prasugrel group between baseline and 24 h measurements (100.0 vs. 4.3%; p < 0.0001). Rates of patients with HTPR at 24 h and 30 days were similar in both groups, so were the tendencies in patterns of platelet inhibition evaluated with multiple electrode aggregometry as compared with the VASP assay. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that prasugrel overcomes HTPR on clopidogrel in the acute phase of interventionally treated ACS and maintains its antiplatelet potency in 30-day follow-up. Potential clinical benefits of personalized antiplatelet prasugrel-based therapy warrant further investigation in clinical ACS trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koziński et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel (n=71). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel (150 mg maintenance dose for 6 days, then 75 mg maintenance dose) was evaluated on Median Platelet Reactivity Index (PRI) at 24 hours. Prasugrel successfully overcame high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in the acute phase of ACS, sharply reducing median platelet reactivity index from 70.0% to 11.9% at 24 hours and maintaining antiplatelet potency at 30 days.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: