Key result
Switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel during the chronic phase after percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced P2Y12 reaction units at 24 weeks compared to continuing clopidogrel (157 vs 189, p=0.007).
Why the study?
The antiplatelet effect and vascular endothelial function of prasugrel compared with clopidogrel during the chronic phase after PCI had not been compared.
Does switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel reduce platelet reactivity and improve vascular endothelial function in patients at the chronic phase after coronary stenting?
RCT (n=99)
Computer-based random number table
Does switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel reduce platelet reactivity and improve vascular endothelial function in patients at the chronic phase after coronary stenting?
Switching to prasugrel may lower chronic PRU after PCI; leaves open effects on progenitor cells and clinical outcomes.
Compared to clopidogrel, prasugrel has a lower incidence of ischemic events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) because of an early reduction during the acute phase in P2Y12 reaction units (PRU). The objective of this study was to compare the antiplatelet effect and vascular endothelial function of both drugs during the chronic phase after PCI. Patients who had undergone PCI and were confirmed to have no restenosis by follow-up coronary angiography under dual anti-platelet therapy with clopidogrel (75 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day) were randomized to either continue clopidogrel or switch to prasugrel (3.75 mg/day). At baseline, prior to randomization we determined the CYP2C19 genotype. At the baseline and 24 weeks after randomization, the P2Y12 reactivity unit (PRU) was measured using the VerifyNow™ P2Y12 assay. Endothelial function was evaluated by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT), while and circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45low progenitor cells were measured by flow cytometric analysis. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) level was also measured. The PRU was reduced significantly in the prasugrel group (P = 0.0008), especially in patients who were intermediate or poor metabolizers based on the CYP2C19 genotype (P < 0.0001). This reduction was not observed in the clopidogrel group. The number of CD34+/CD133+/CD45low cells increased in the clopidogrel group (P = 0.008), but not in the prasugrel group. The hsCRP, FMD and reactive hyperemia index measured by RH-PAT did not change in either group. Prasugrel is potentially better than clopidogrel for preventing thrombotic events, although clopidogrel may have an advantage over prasugrel in terms of preventing atherosclerotic events. Proper use of thienopyridine drugs based on the CYP2C19 genotype has promising clinical potential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masuyama et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=99). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel (75 mg/day) was evaluated on P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) at 24 weeks (p=0.007). Switching from clopidogrel to prasugrel during the chronic phase after percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced P2Y12 reaction units at 24 weeks compared to continuing clopidogrel (157 vs 189, p=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: