Key result
Higher admission eosinophils post-STEMI are linked to ~1.4 mm less adverse LV remodeling.
Why the study?
The clinical significance of eosinophils in post-infarction cardiac remodeling after STEMI remains unclear.
Does high admission eosinophil count improve post-infarction cardiac remodeling in patients with first-time STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=452)
No
Does high admission eosinophil count improve post-infarction cardiac remodeling in patients with first-time STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Effect estimate: standardized β = -0.154
Absolute Event Rate: -0.4% vs 1%
p-value: p=0.046
Higher admission eosinophil counts are independently associated with attenuated left ventricular remodeling after first-time STEMI, suggesting its potential as a practical prognostic biomarker.
Experimental studies suggest that eosinophils promote myocardial repair after myocardial infarction; however, their clinical significance in post-infarction cardiac remodeling remains unclear. We investigated the association between admission peripheral eosinophil counts and left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) remodeling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This retrospective single-center study included 452 consecutive patients with first-time STEMI who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention between 2016 and 2024. Patients were divided into high and low eosinophil groups according to the median admission eosinophil count (70 cells/µL). Echocardiography was performed during the acute phase and at 6–12 months. Changes in LV end-diastolic diameter (ΔLVDd) and left atrial volume index (ΔLAVI) were evaluated. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of remodeling. Patients with higher eosinophil counts showed significantly smaller increases in LVDd (ΔLVDd: − 0.4 ± 6.3 vs. + 1.0 ± 4.8 mm, *p* = 0.03) and greater reductions in LAVI (ΔLAVI: − 2.2 ± 9.6 vs. + 1.1 ± 11.4 mL/m 2 , *p* = 0.01) than those with lower eosinophil counts. Admission eosinophil count was independently associated with ΔLVDd (standardized β = − 0.154, *p* = 0.046), whereas no independent association was observed with ΔLAVI. In subgroup analysis, the favorable association between eosinophils and LA remodeling was observed primarily in patients with LAD infarction. No significant differences were observed in one-year mortality or heart failure readmission. Higher admission eosinophil counts were associated with favorable LV and LA remodeling after STEMI. Admission eosinophil count was independently associated with attenuation of LV remodeling, suggesting that it may serve as a practical biomarker for identifying patients at lower risk of adverse cardiac remodeling after STEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watanabe et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=452). High admission eosinophil count vs. Low admission eosinophil count was evaluated on Change in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (ΔLVDd) (standardized β = -0.154, p=0.046). Higher admission eosinophil counts after STEMI were independently associated with attenuated left ventricular remodeling, showing smaller increases in end-diastolic diameter (-0.4 vs +1.0 mm, p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: