As artificial intelligence (AI) applications proliferate across professions, understanding factors that influence individuals' perceived likelihood to misuse AI is critical. This research delved into the intricate dynamics of individual AI experiences and their planned behavioral attributes, including behavioral attitudes, social expectations, and behavioral intentions. Using Attribution Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior, we investigated how these factors synergistically interacted to shape AI misuse perceptions. Our findings indicated that individuals with high AI familiarity believe that AI misuse was more pronounced for individuals outside their own business profession compared to those within it. However, this perception varied significantly across disciplines. Additionally, this asymmetric cross-functional perceived susceptibility for AI misuse was moderated by various cognitive and motivational attributions. This study contributed to the burgeoning field of AI ethics by offering a comprehensive analysis of the human-AI interface, paving the way for future research, informed interventions, and policies that foster responsible AI use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: