Why the study?
Do baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure variability differ between responders and non-responders to therapy during the acute phase of septic shock?
Do baroreflex sensitivity and blood pressure variability differ between responders and non-responders to therapy during the acute phase of septic shock?
Analysis of BP and HR variability, along with baroreflex sensitivity, provides deeper insights into autonomic control and therapeutic responsiveness in septic shock than mean BP alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autonomic BP/HR metrics may identify septic shock responders; hypothesis-generating for prospective BRS-guided trials.
BACKGROUND: Mean values of hemodynamic variables are poorly effective in evaluating an actual recovery of the short-term autonomic mechanisms for blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) regulation. The aim of this work is to analyze the response to therapy in the early phase of septic shock to verify possible associations between BP recovery and BP autonomic control. METHODS: This is an ancillary study from the multicenter prospective observational trial Shockomics (NCT02141607). A total of 21 septic shock patients were studied at two time points during the acute phase of shock and were classified according to changes in SOFA score. Time series of BP components and HR were analyzed in time and frequency domain. Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) was assessed, and a mathematical model for the decomposition of diastolic arterial pressure (DAP) oscillations was used to understand the different contributions of BRS and HR on peripheral vascular resistance control. RESULTS: Only those patients, who significantly improved organ function (responders, R), showed an increase of mean value and low frequency (LF) power in BP time series. Fluid accumulation was higher in the non-responders (NR). BRS increased in NR and the model of DAP variability showed that the contribution of HR was highly reduced in NR. CONCLUSIONS: Although patients reached the mean BP target of 65 mmHg, our analyses highlighted important differences in terms of autonomic nervous system control. BP variability, HR variability and baroreflex trends can add information to individual vital sign measure such as mean BP, and can help in understanding the responsiveness to the combination of symphatomimetic drugs and fluid therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrara et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: