Why the study?
Understanding the aetiology and incidence of injuries in American football may aid sports professionals in developing prevention strategies to protect athletes.
What is the prevalence of injuries and its association with training characteristics in American football players in Brazil?
What is the prevalence of injuries and its association with training characteristics in American football players in Brazil?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
American football players in Brazil experience a high prevalence of injuries, primarily during training and via direct contact, highlighting the need for targeted injury prevention strategies.
Introduction American football is a high-impact collision sport, which may lead to high injury rates in the players. Thus, knowing the aetiology and incidence of injuries may be useful not only for the treatment, but especially to help sports professionals to develop strategies or mechanisms of prevention while aiming to maintain the physical integrity of the athletes. Purpose The aim of the study was to verify the prevalence of injury among American football players from the Santa Catarina state of Brazil. Methods The total of 140 athletes were evaluated in the study with the use of an online questionnaire. Descriptive logistic regression and t-test analysis were applied (p < 0.05). Results A high injury prevalence (74%) in the evaluated athletes was observed. Most of these injuries occurred during training (56%) and by direct contact between players (64%). Shoulders, knees, and hand/fingers were the most commonly injured body parts (14%, 13%, 12%, respectively). The most frequent types of injuries were those related to joints (46%) and muscles (39%), and very few concussions were reported. We found a significant positive association showing that the athletes that performed a conditioning program presented higher injury prevalence (p = 0.01).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Costa et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: