Econometric panel analysis demonstrates that green public procurement increases firm productivity and reduces corruption risks, highlighting dual economic and environmental benefits.
Green Public Procurement (GPP) is promoted for environmental sustainability, but its economic effects are less studied. This paper examines GPP's impact on firm productivity, competition, and corruption risks in Bulgaria, a challenging context for governance. Using data from public procurement contracts (2011–2019) and firm‐level panel data, we analyze the relationship between GPP participation and productivity. Results of panel fixed effects models show that firms winning GPP contracts have 14% higher labor productivity and up to 6% higher total factor productivity, particularly under competitive, low‐corruption risk procedures. GPP also enhances market competition by increasing firm entry, reducing supplier dominance, and lowering local winner shares. Additionally, it reduces corruption risks, as reflected by a drop in the Corruption Risk Index and a 1.5 percentage point decrease in single bidding rates. These findings highlight GPP's dual role in advancing environmental goals and improving economic efficiency and procurement integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Poltoratskaia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: