Retrospective cohort study shows high histological regression with topical imiquimod in young women with cervical neoplasia, suggesting a feasible strategy to delay fertility-impairing surgery.
Abstract Background As cervical excisional treatment is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, imiquimod has been explored in several studies—such as the TOPIC-3—as an alternative but without success. Therefore, we designed a study focusing on patients aged < 35 years to verify its efficacy. Methods We conducted a retrospective, single-arm cohort study, gathering the medical records of nulliparous women aged < 35 years who had never undergone cervical excisional therapy between October 2021 and March 2024. The primary goal was to identify the rate of histological regression and high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) clearance at 3, 6, and 12 months, as well as beyond, after completing 8 weeks of weekly imiquimod treatment. Results The immediate regression rate from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3 lesions to at least CIN 1 was 96.0% after 8 weeks of weekly imiquimod therapy, and the HPV clearance rate at that time was 47.3%. During follow-up, the observed rates of complete remission to normal, regression lower than that of CIN 1, and HPV clearance were 81.6%, 92.9%, and 56.0%, respectively. Notably, the subgroup of patients diagnosed with CIN 2 without HPV16 or 18 achieved the highest regression rate of 96.5%. Among the patients, 7.1% showed persistent disease, and only 1.0% underwent cervical invasive therapies. Conclusions We suggest that topical imiquimod therapies could serve as a potential alternative to postponing cervical excisional therapies for up to 1 year in women < 35 years with CIN2 or 3, who are concerned about future pregnancy outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: