Pre–post study demonstrates significant communicative gains in adults with aphasia, indicating the benefit of integrating psychological and language therapy.
Purpose: People with aphasia are at risk of becoming depressed, anxious, and isolated. They want therapy to focus on improving communication, confidence, and finding ways to live well; family members want to be involved in the therapy process. We aimed to codesign and test a novel intervention (EmotionaL and Language recovery in Aphasia [ELLA]) that would address these priorities through integrating two evidence-based therapy approaches: elaborated semantic feature analysis (SFA), a naming therapy, and solution-focused brief therapy (SFBT), a psychological therapy. Method: A series of workshops were held with five people with aphasia (six workshops), three family members (three workshops), and four speech-language pathologists (SLPs; three workshops). In addition, meetings were held with experts in SFBT and elaborated SFA. This information was analyzed using qualitative content analysis and mapped onto a therapy manual. Advisors with aphasia ( n = 5) and student SLPs ( n = 4) trialed therapy components for further refinement prior to a proof-of-concept pre–post group study ( n = 8 participants with aphasia). The therapy was codelivered by student SLPs supervised by an experienced SLP; participants received, on average, 14.25 sessions ( SD = 2.25) over 7 weeks. The primary clinical outcome was the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB); participants also took part in in-depth interviews posttherapy analyzed using framework analysis. Results: Themes from the codesign stage included the following: choosing meaningful therapy targets, integrating impairment and psychological therapy, managing endings, involving family, supporting home practice, dosage and delivery, and achieving real-life change. Participants in the proof-of-concept study made significant gains on the CPIB ( p = .006, Cohen's d = 1.37). All participants highly valued the therapeutic relationship and were positive about combining psychological and language components within the same intervention. Conclusions: ELLA has been designed as a holistic, humanistic language therapy. This study suggests that ELLA may be a promising way to enable SLPs to address both emotional and language recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Northcott et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: